Cholesterol, diabetes, diet, Fat, gluten-free, Grain free, Guidelines, hormone, immune system, insulin, insulin resistant, keto, ketogenic, lifestyle, low carb, macros, NAFLD, nurse, nurse practitioner, paleo, PCOS, Uncategorized, vitamin

One Person at a Time – We CAN Change the World

 

It is truly a shame that mainstream medical providers, highly trained and well-educated professionals, continue to encourage hundreds of grams of carbohydrate intake on a daily basis when simple logic shows that the approach is not helping to reduce elevated glucose, decrease weight, lower blood pressure, or improve health in any form at all. For many years, now, the nutritional guidelines have encouraged an intake of 200+ grams of carbohydrates daily, even though our bloodstream only requires 4 grams.  For a person with diabetes and insulin resistance, this advice is detrimental to health.  This recommendation contributes to significant over-eating, poor nutrient intake, and terrible internal chemical imbalance – all of which contribute to chronic metabolic conditions.

This advice does NOT differ for Type 1 diabetics, Type 2 diabetics, or for anyone with insulin resistance. Type 1 patients require insulin administration daily so they can metabolize & properly manage the carb & protein intake.  Type 2 patients often end up using insulin injections because the tablets and diet do not provide enough assistance internally to lower glucose and organ damage.  Patients with insulin resistance often require hundreds of units of insulin a day just to keep glucose levels less than 200.  (Less than 100 is NORMAL.)

Anyone with an over-the-counter glucometer can determine this simple and logical conclusion quite easily. Test glucose prior to eating; test again about 2 hours after eating.  If glucose level changes more than 10 numbers, there are likely many carbohydrates in that meal.  So, next meal, test again, leaving out those particular carbohydrates.  Determine for yourself just how to eat with minimal impact on glucose level.

Even a non-scientist understands the simple anatomy and physiological response within our bodies.

“The problem is that carbohydrates break down into glucose, which causes the body to release insulin—a hormone that is fantastically efficient at storing fat. Meanwhile, fructose, the main sugar in fruit, causes the liver to generate triglycerides and other lipids in the blood that are altogether bad news. Excessive carbohydrates lead not only to obesity but also, over time, to Type 2 diabetes and, very likely, heart disease.” – Excerpt from The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-questionable-link-between-saturated-fat-and-heart-disease-1399070926, retrieved 2/21/2018.

Why is testing like this necessary? Testing glucose is necessary to gain control of your own illness and health. Medical providers are trained to prescribe medications that are produced and sold to provide a source of steady income to drug companies.  Medical providers need a steady and full schedule of patients in order to provide a steady income for their staffs and themselves.  Medical providers have NO coursework in nutrition, except for a freshman or sophomore course as a pre-requisite to professional medical, nursing, or nutrition school.  There is NO training whatsoever for medical providers to learn how to incorporate nutrition as a part of therapeutic treatment for chronic metabolic conditions.  They never hear the word ketogenic nutrition; they have no idea what normal and natural ketosis is.

That said, mainstream providers do the best they can with info and training they’ve been provided; none of them actually WANT us sick or on meds. It is simply all they know.  Medical providers have guidelines and “standards of care” to which we’re held responsible.  These guidelines encourage us to prescribe certain medications as diabetes is diagnosed and then progresses. We are to obtain certain lab testing at specified intervals.  We are trained to tell patients that an A1c of 7 or less is “NORMAL for a diabetic.”  We are trained to use these guidelines as our “logic” and reasoning, even though very little of the guidelines has any actual research supporting the use; most of the research quoted has been debunked many times over the past 5-8 years by independent experts without financial interest in the outcomes.

Why do our trusted and trained medical providers offer such flawed advice? It goes back 50-70 years.  It started in the 1950s when President Eisenhower suffered a heart attack while in office.  Some strong personalities were already studying and researching diet and the impacts of diet on health.  Ancel Keys is credited with starting this avalanche of low fat diet advice, but others quickly hopped on his bandwagon.  The often-quoted and cited Framingham Study also released only part of the data collected and was used as “evidence” that saturated fats caused high cholesterol which caused deadly heart disease. However, Dr. William Castelli, a former director of the Framingham Heart study, stated in a 1992 editorial published in the Archives of Internal Medicine:

In Framingham, Mass., the more saturated fat one ate, the more cholesterol one ate, the more calories one ate, the lower the person’s serum cholesterol. The opposite of what… Keys et al would predict…We found that the people who ate the most cholesterol, ate the most saturated fat, ate the most calories, weighed the least and were the most physically active.”

This major piece of data was NOT released as part of the study; it only came out later as part of the editorial by the former director of the study. By 1980, so much money and time had been invested in low-fat dietary research, it seemed no one could stop it. Thus, the “Standard Dietary Guidelines for Americans” was published. Later, the American Heart Association also joined in the support of these guidelines; the American Diabetes Association also began to support these guidelines.  No science.  No independent research data. Thus, we the people were “fleeced” and fell right in line with this dietary advice.  We began cutting fats and one of the first fats to go was milkfat, and then animal fats.

milkfat pic          animal fat pic

However, look at what happened to the weight of Americans.

 

Multiple resources offer similar trends in weight; notice the trend of weight gain began during the 1970s and 80s, when low-fat dietary advice was pushed forward as “healthy.”

disease trends

Using some simple common sense and logic, we can review history and data and draw some logical conclusions based on these numbers. As fat intake declined, obesity and heart disease rates increased.  What replaced the fat?

carb intake

474 grams of carbohydrates will be converted into 118 TEASPOONS of glucose – that’s 2.5 CUPS of sugar. Just what do medical experts EXPECT our bodies to do with this much glucose?

Even at the lowest ADA recommended intake of 165 grams of carbs per day, those carbs convert into nearly 7 ounces of glucose – almost 1 whole cup of glucose.

Think about our most vulnerable of our population: our children. Then, narrow down that population to Type 1 children. Current recommendations for managing this illness is to eat high amounts of carbohydrates and to administer higher and higher amounts of insulin to lower the glucose load.  How does this advice even seem normal, now that we’ve seen the data? Do their brains develop normally with such significantly elevated glucose levels? Some experts are calling Alzheimer disease Type 3 diabetes because we now recognize the brain damage done by high glucose and high insulin levels – yet, it’s the “standard” treatment for our most vulnerable population?  Why would we actually WANT our children to consume hundreds of grams of carbohydrates daily, just to be able to dose higher amounts of insulin? Why should we continue to advise high carb intake when it has now been linked to higher rates of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, infertility, and even cancer – even in our children? I fail to see the logic.  Our children deserve better.  Our children deserve NORMAL glucose levels.  They should not be at risk for developing “double diabetes,” because we continue to encourage high carb intake and high insulin use, forcing their bodies to become insulin resistant over time.  These children are one of our most valuable resources; why can’t we provide better advice and care?

One person at a time. One medical provider at a time.  One conversation at a time, we are taking charge of our own health.  We are doing the “research” by checking our own glucose.  We track our intake.  We, at the grassroots level, are doing research that government and agencies and companies should have done half a century ago.  We are cutting out the highly inflammatory grains.  We are cutting out sugar.  We are eliminating the cause of our metabolic disease, and our health improves because we are PRO-active instead of reactive.  We are using food as our medicine…. Isn’t that what Hippocrates said?  “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.”  And our medical physicians take the Hippocratic oath, which includes the phrase, “do no harm.”  I think it’s time we hold our providers accountable for their advice.  What do YOU think?

Advertisements
Cholesterol, diet, Fat, Guidelines, insulin, keto, ketogenic, lifestyle, low carb, macros, NAFLD, nurse, nurse practitioner, paleo, PCOS, Uncategorized, vitamin

Do the Math – Calculate Your Macro Goals

I use the simplest keto calculator available, using IDEAL body weight NOT current body weight – as many calculators do.

First, determine your ideal weight. There are many ranges and charts available, but I use the simplest version from nursing school many years ago. We use ideal weight because we want to lose weight or maintain a healthy weight. If we use current weight for our calculations, then our macro goals will be set to sustain our current weight.

Start with your current height — females are allowed 100 pounds for first 5 feet and 5 pounds per inch over that. Males are allowed the same 100 pounds for the first 5 feet and 6 pounds per inch over.

Example: a 5’5” female would have an AVERAGE ideal weight of 125 lbs, while a male of same height would have average ideal weight of 130lbs. (Let me offer this one tidbit: I understand that many people freak out with these weights, but they really are ideal for the heights. Google images of people from 1950 – BEFORE the low fat craze. People were much thinner and were perfectly healthy. We’ve become desensitized to body weights for lots of reasons, but it has skewed our perspective of what a body should look like.)

Now that you’ve calculated your ideal weight, we will use that number to identify our protein needs per day. At 5’5”, a female’s average ideal weight would be around 125 lbs. Convert that to kilograms using the standard conversion factor, 2.2.

Math would look like: 125/2.2 = 56.8. So your weight in kg is 56.8. For people of average daily activity, the recommendation is 1 gram of protein per 1 kg if body weight.

So, protein needs would be approx 56.8 grams per day — divided into 2 or 3 meals per day, based on lifestyle and personal choices.

For our way of eating, we calculate our protein needs and then use that to determine our fat needs – approx double the protein goal. So you would need about 114 grams for fat per day.

Carb grams are counted as total carbs bc fiber carbohydrates DO impact some people’s glucose levels. Max carb goal should be 20 grams per day or 6-7 per meal.

I hope I’ve kept this as easy and simple as possible. Yes. There are many keto calculators but most do NOT account for metabolic disorders or they are athlete-based, resulting in very high protein intake and excess proteins will be converted into glucose in the absence of carbs — not good for anyone with insulin resistance or diabetes.

breakfast, Cholesterol, diabetes, diet, Fat, gluten-free, Grain free, Guidelines, hormone, immune system, insulin, insulin resistant, keto, ketogenic, lifestyle, low carb, NAFLD, nurse, nurse practitioner, paleo, PCOS, supplement, Uncategorized, vitamin

Measures of “Improving Health”

Recently, another health care provider mocked my use of the phrase, “improving the health of my patients”, saying that it’s vague and not measurable.
Her comments gave me pause, because the goal of every nurse I’ve ever met has been to help people improve their health. Ask any nurse why he or she became a nurse, and you will hear a variety of ways people say it. We nurses help people get well, better, or over a health obstacle. How is that measured?
First and foremost, there are many parameters used by health care providers to measure health. With diagnoses of diabetes and hypertension, we measure glucose and blood pressure, respectively. But we often have difficulty quantifying how people feel when they lower their glucose or blood pressure. When patients return for follow-up and I’m able to tell them their hemoglobin A1c dropped from 8.9 to 6.4 after weeks of diet changes and effort, people are thrilled. They grin from ear to ear. They clap. They shake a fist in the air. They “high five” me. Some even do a “happy dance.” What is measurable here? Yes, the glucose levels are numerical and easy to track. But how does anyone put a scale on happiness or joyfulness? Can the idea that diabetic complications no longer pose a looming hazard to health be measured? How is relief quantified when kidney damage has improved?


These feelings are not measurable, yet they are extremely evident in behaviors and attitude. Patients who work toward improving health exhibit gratefulness that good instruction is provided; is that gratitude measurable?
Measures are important in health care. Measurements of pulse or blood pressure provide vital information to us who render the care. I decided that some of you might be interested in knowing what measures we use for certain conditions so you can track your own progress over time.
With diabetes, one of the most important measures is glucose, of course; in addition, the hemoglobin A1c that tells us the average glucose levels over the past 90-100 days provides a good correlation to patient effort in managing the condition. While mainstream medicine will say that “good” diabetes control occurs when the A1c is around 7, many studies have shown that diabetic complications occur when the A1c runs higher than about 6.2 or so. Normal A1c levels run around 5 or less; why should people diagnosed with diabetes be forced to run glucose levels so high that we KNOW organ damage will occur? Is that going to help patients “improve their health”?
Elevated blood pressure is often associated with diabetes because high glucose levels cause thick, sticky blood; demanding that the heart pump thick, sticky blood to an overweight body will eventually result in high blood pressure. The heart will pump harder and with more force to move thick “syrupy” blood through tiny blood vessels, resulting in higher and higher blood pressure readings. When blood pressure increases, the heart muscle becomes compromised and weaker. Daily demands on the heart that continually exceed it’s designed capabilities can contribute to a multitude of vague symptoms which are not measurable, including headaches, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, or even mild swelling. While most of these symptoms have no quantifiable scale, patients will describe how much better they feel once blood pressure is lowered. While blood pressure is measurable, the feeling of lower and healthier blood pressure is described by patients as “improved health.”
If blood pressure remains untreated or poorly managed, heart failure and/or kidney damage begin to occur. Highly pressurized blood flow moving through the kidneys will damage the fragile vessels, reducing the filtering ability of the kidneys. Elevated glucose can also damage these tiny vessels, resulting in inflammatory responses by the body that are designed to patch and repair damage – but this natural response by the body can result in blood vessel blockages. Think scar tissue.

In this photo below, notice that cholesterol is serving as the patch, relating the damage to the blood vessel. Cholesterol isNOT the cause of clots; it’s part of the damage control/repair team of the body. In summary, how do we measure “improved health”? How can we quantify patient comments when they express gratitude for how they feel? How can we count the number of clinic visits these patients will NOT have? How do we track hospitalizations that do NOT occur for these patients? What evidence do we see when ER visits are no longer the norm for people with “normal” glucose or blood pressure? We can’t. But these numbers ARE real. These people ARE changing their lives and IMPROVING HEALTH!

If you want to take charge of YOUR health, email us for more info at KetoNurses@gmail.com

Cholesterol, diabetes, diet, Fat, gluten-free, Grain free, Guidelines, insulin, insulin resistant, keto, ketogenic, lifestyle, low carb, nurse practitioner, Uncategorized

Tips & Tricks to Master LCHF 

Sometimes life impacts our food choices and our intake of processed foods increases, although they may be higher in fat or lower carb. Many times, I get messages, asking for our “approval” to consume off-plan foods like keto breads and ice creams. While some of these foods’ ingredients may be included on the LCHF food list, I strongly encourage people to consume the majority of your intake from real foods. Real meats. Real vegetables. Real fats. Eating from a bag, box or can/jar provides very few essential vitamins and minerals because many manufacturing methods contribute to decreased nutrients. Vegetables contain a lot of micronutrients and phytonutrients our bodies use daily; some have to be replaced regularly. Going days or weeks without any vegetables at all can contribute to a variety of vague symptoms, including increased fatigue, headache, & nausea. There are no magic vitamins in a bottle that can replace your veggies. Meats are strongly encouraged on LCHF as they also contain many essential nutrients, especially red meat – beef, venison, & other wild game. Red meat is about the only source of high quantities of b12 & iron – both of which are essential to our health. Chicken, turkey & pork contain only minuscule amounts of iron,if any at all. Iron is what gives meat its red color, thus the need for red meat. (Yes, vegetarians can eat LCHF, but must pay very special attention to the iron and b12 sources or risk poor health.) 

Do not fear red meat. Red meat has been falsely accused of causing health hazards. People survived eating red meat and its fat for centuries before the industrial revolution came along and packaged all our food. Manufacturing processes, including planting, harvesting, & packaging always decrease nutrient density – meaning everything that comes from a company and packaged, contains very little nutrition. Choose real bacon over turkey bacon. Choose 30% fat in burger meat. Choose real butter over margarine. Choose preservative-free foods when possible. 

Questions about bacon always surface… LOL Bacon IS best with fewest additives, or if you can find pork belly or side meat, it usually doesn’t have added sugars or preservatives; even so, most bacon is still way better for us than most anything in a bag or box. 

Baaaaacon!

Reading nutrition labels and ingredient lists is required reading for truly gaining control over health. Just because a nutrition label says 1.5 grams of carbs per serving doesn’t always mean it’s good for you. Look at ingredients –

Watch for hidden grains, sugars, and dextrin components. There are over

60 different terms that companies use to disguise sugar. Become aware of how companies sneak sugars and sweeteners into their packages. If the 1.5 grams of carbs come from wheat, and you’re sensitive to it, those carbs might send your glucose jumping! And then you’ll battle that glucose spike for hours or even days. Also, remember to check serving size. An example is a 20 ounce soda which is typically 2.5 servings; nutrient info then is NOT for the entire bottle.

Choose water over soda, sparkling drinks, and commercially prepared flavored waters – most of these items contain added sweeteners of one sort or the other and will almost always impact glucose level. Avoid ALL foods labeled as sugar-free and read labels extremely carefully. If it’s sugar free, the company has added SOMETHING to it to make it palatable and desirable. Manufacturers are catering to our “sweet tooth” by making foods sweeter and sweeter; heck, they are even modifying our fruit for maximal sweetness!!
Speaking of fruits… avoid them! In low carb nutrition, we recognize the horrible impact of fruits on our glucose levels. But most people who’ve followed the ADA way for many years are totally unaware that fruit has such an impact. They still believe fruits are good for us, but they aren’t. Only occasional berries – AFTER glucose normalization occurs – are allowed on our LCHF way of eating. If in doubt, perform your own experiment. Test before and after. For experts and such highly educated people to proclaim that fruits and grains are good for us over the past 50 years, is beyond my comprehension. They claim their diet is based on scientific data – tests – measurable numbers. But they’ve never run REAL tests! Their diet is based solely on hypothesis and conjecture. Our way of eating is based on 70+ scientific studies AND thousands of people who live LCHF every day.  
Read vitamin & supplement labels! Many contain cellulose, maltodextrin, corn syrup solids, and wheat as binders and fillers; these items will cause elevated glucose levels. Be very wary of any vitamin drink, protein shake, or miracle concoction that promises symptom relief or improved health. Most of these mixes are completely filled with difficult-to-pronounce chemicals, not foods. Even the “all-natural” ones are loaded with sugars. (Just a side note: cyanide & arsenic are natural.) Our bodies were meant to eat/chew food, not obtain empty calories from chemical concoctions. It’s important for the brain to perceive intake, and part of that process includes chewing. Drinking calories totally bypasses that signal to the brain, and so the body can still feel hungry and not satiated, even with hundreds of calories consumed. 


Hopefully, these tips will help y’all get a better grasp of how I eat and teach people to eat and how so many people are able to drastically reduce glucose levels and lose weight. If you are at a stall — your glucose just won’t fall any more, or your weight just isn’t budging — it may be time for re-evaluation of your intake; take a real look at the packaging you’re eating from. Look at all labels. Look at all ingredients. Look at serving sizes. Eat fresh or frozen veggies – without added sauces and such. Canned veggies can be ok – but always check labels.  
Record all intake and verify nutrient info in your app with google or label on package. The more accurate your info, the healthier your intake will be. Many apps are “editable” by users – meaning you could enter data that says your avocados only have 1 gram of carbs per avocado – very untrue. But if that’s what you select in your app, your numbers will not be accurate and it will show in your glucose level — but you will be posting about how frustrating it is to eat from the list but still have high glucose. 
If you’ve reached a stall, you should also re-evaluate your macros – the fats, proteins, & carbs – you’re consuming. There are many methods of identifying ideal weight, but this is the one I use. For the first 5 feet, one is allowed 100 pounds. For females, we’re allowed 5 pounds for every inch over 5′. Males are allowed 6 pounds for every inch over 5′. Divide your ideal weight by 2.2 and this will give you an approx protein need for you at your ideal weight. This is the number of grams of protein you’ll need in one day, and should be approx 15-25% of calories you consume daily. Divide this number of grams by the number of meals you typically have daily and then you’ll know how many grams of protein you’ll need in one meal; also remember that on average, there are approx 7 grams of protein in 1 ounce of meat. For instance, a 4 ounce filet would contain approx 28 grams of protein for one meal of your day. 

To determine your fat needs, double the number of fat grams per day. For example, if your protein needs are 56 grams per day, you should need approx 112 grams of fat in your meals daily, preferably evenly divided over all meals. 


For a female who is approximately 5′ 5″ tall, her protein needs would be approx 57 grams per day, and fat needs would be approx 114 grams per day. 20 grams of carbs would be the maximum allowed. Now, to calculate how much of this is CALORIC intake percentage, we have to convert grams into calories. Carbs provide 4 calories per gram, so for our female client here, that would be 20 x 4 = 80 calories. Protein also provides 4 calories per gram, so this lady would consume 57 x 4 = 228 calories of protein daily. Fats provide 9 calories per gram; 114 x 9= 1,026. Total these: 80 + 228 + 1026 = 1334 calories per day. Then, figure percent of caloric intake: 80/1334 = 6% of intake comes from carbohydrates. 228/1334= 17% of calorie intake is from protein. 1026/1334 = 77% of calories will come from fat. To calculate YOUR needs, follow this example carefully, & you will figure your grams and percentage of calories quite easily. 
If you use current weight or too high of an ideal weight to determine your macro needs, you’re likely to reach stalls and plateaus, becoming frustrated. If you’re very active, your protein needs will be a bit higher; if you’re pretty sedentary, your protein needs will be a bit less. 
I realize I’ve rambled on far too long, now. Sorry about that. I just wanted to share some of these tips because I see many of you struggling with these concepts and questions.